Knoppix Performance on USB with ReiserFS

[utu]

Thanks, Werner; but,

That is the explanation by KK that I don't understand:
1. Would Reiserfs be a good idea as well for LiveUSB?
2. If so, why aren't we using it now?
3. For the 'usual' crashed LiveUSB should one try a fsck to repair it?
4. In case 3, I've alway just burned a new copy & brought it up-to-date
with a backup of home/, etc/ and 'syslinux.cfg

What is KK saying here, anyway?
I was hoping fmateo (or anyone) had an explanation I could understand.
__________________________________________________ _____________________

Also, in my post #4 here, the units are MB/s not Mb/s.
B/s are 8 b/s, in SanDisk documentation. I have the feeling that
the USB is not slowing things down, but I'm not sure of the math.

[fmateo]

I did the syslog and ntpdate procedures, and the result was 42 seconds on my laptop (with wifi), should be some seconds less with wired conection...

Next step is to compare briefly with a vfat formatted usbstick and another one formatted as reiserfs